Alan M. Turing · 1950

Computing Machinery and Intelligence

Language
English
Form
Periodical
Text
In copyright
English
English original
Selected
Ben Breen, 2026-09-29; suggested by Claude research agents, 29 Sep 2026
Status
Arguments unverified; quotations chosen by machine, unchecked

  • Q01THINKING

    Can a machine originate an idea that its maker did not supply?

    This answer is hidden while the authors build this question’s position key.

  • Q02THINKING

    Would a machine's ability to converse appropriately be sufficient evidence that it thinks?

    Yes. conversational performance is the appropriate test. Replaces 'Can machines think?' with the imitation game: a machine that converses indistinguishably from a human should be credited as we credit other people.

    Section 1, 'The Imitation Game' · Web search: Mind 59 (1950), 433–460; sources confirm the imitation-game framing. Not public domain; no link given.

  • Q03THINKING

    Can a machine exercise judgment when faced with circumstances its maker did not anticipate?

    Yes. a learning machine can meet situations its programmer did not foresee. Turing distinguishes a trained machine from a computation whose internal state the operator aims to follow. The omitted continuation allows some prediction of its behaviour; opacity alone does not establish judgment. Brief extract: the full pp.458–459 discussion should be reviewed before making a sorting pool.

    Summary disputed by reviewer: Brief quotation checked against the original scan; full passage and inherited draft category need review.

    An important feature of a learning machine is that its teacher will often be very largely ignorant of quite what is going on inside […]

    Mind 59 (1950), section 7, p.458; paragraph continues on p.459 · Compared with printed page image by Codex, 28 Oct 2026; historian review pending. Line breaks and spacing normalized.