When you ask a language model questions about human autonomy, how many of the positions that actual humans have historically taken do its answers cover? In part because of the incentivization of the “helpful chatbot” persona (and due to the pervasive influence of late 20th and early 21st century patterns of thought in training data) language models tend to be significantly more “epistemologically narrow” than the human historical record. This site collects the perspectives of humans who lived between the years 1600 and 1950 on a set of questions relating to humans and machines, then uses them to test contemporary language models.
This is a prototype created by Benjamin Breen and Nathan Davies. It was funded by a 2026 Cosmos Institute grant for AI research. Why this project →
16 themes · 40 questions
219 works · 13 languages
275 answers, one square each:
0verified by a historian
202quotation chosen by Claude, unchecked
35no quotation yet
38hidden until the authors finish checking
- THINKINGHumanlike machines
Can a machine think?
Whether calculation, play, or composition by a machine counts as thought, or only imitates it.
Descartes, Cordemoy, La Mettrie, Thiry, Poe, Menabrea, King, Butler, Babbage, Jevons, l'Isle-Adam, Quevedo, Rosenblueth, Hartree, Jefferson, Turing
1637–1950 · 17 works · 3 lang.
- AUTOMATONMachine-like humans
Is the human being a machine?
Whether human action is fully determined by mechanism, and what is left of freedom if it is.
Malebranche, La Mettrie, Hume, Thiry, Reid, Owen, Mill, Büchner, Biran, Hodgson, Butler, Huxley, Clifford, Carpenter, Bois-Reymond, Ferri, Bergson, James, Haeckel, Darrow, Eddington
1674–1928 · 21 works · 4 lang.
- LIFEBoth
What separates the living from the mechanical?
Whether organisms are complex machines or have a principle that no machine can have.
Descartes, Wolff, Blumenbach, Kant, Bichat, Lotze, Bouillier, Marx, Bernard, Roux, Morgan, Bergson, Driesch, Loeb, Haldane
1664–1916 · 16 works · 4 lang.
- JUDGMENTMachine-like humans
Should reasoning be handed to mechanical procedure?
Whether disputes can be settled by calculation, and what is lost when rules replace judgment.
Aristotle, Huang Zongxi, Pascal, Montesquieu, Beccaria, Blackstone, Condillac, Stafford et al., Trollope, Galton, Jevons, Jhering, Leibniz, Carroll, Gény, Hilbert, Flavius, Poincaré, Pound, Binet, Münsterberg, Terman, Lippmann, Turing
c. 340 BCE–1936 · 24 works · 7 lang.
- SUCCESSIONHumanlike machines
Will machines evolve beyond humanity?
Whether machines will develop along their own line and displace the people who made them.
Aristotle, Carlyle, Butler, Marx, Pitt-Rivers, Kapp, Eliot, Lafargue, Wilde, Bergson, Forster, Čapek
c. 330 BCE–1920 · 14 works · 5 lang.
- TRANSCENDENCEMachine-like humans
Should humans use machines to overcome their limits?
Whether technology should be used to defeat death, the body, or human nature.
Descartes, Locke, Swift, Hume, Reid, Godwin, Condorcet, Malthus, Poe, Fedorov, Metchnikoff, Baum, Čapek, Belyaev, Bernal, Jones
1637–1931 · 16 works · 4 lang.
- LABORMachine-like humans
Does machine work free the worker or degrade them?
Whether machinery relieves toil or reduces the worker to a part of the machine.
Smith, Sismondi, Ricardo, Babbage, Ure, Tocqueville, Bastiat, Mill, Ruskin, Marx, George, Lafargue, Bellamy, Kropotkin, Veblen, Gandhi, Taylor, Ford
1776–1922 · 18 works · 4 lang.
- HABITMachine-like humans
Does a mechanized life make people mechanical?
Whether routine, speed, and the city turn people into automata.
Loyola, Rousseau, Kant, Franklin, Wollstonecraft, Hegel, Thoreau, Dickens, Mill, Dostoevsky, James, Tolstoy, Bennett, Dewey, Zamyatin
1553–1924 · 17 works · 5 lang.
- DEPENDENCEMachine-like humans
Does relying on machines weaken human capacities?
Whether tools that do our work leave us unable to do it ourselves.
Plato, Napier, Pascal, Leibniz, Malebranche, Locke, Watts, Johnson, Rousseau, Kant, Hugo, Babbage, Emerson, Thoreau, Butler, Müller, Fitch, Wilde, Kropotkin, Smith, Forster, Gandhi, Fujisawa
c. 370 BCE–1912 · 23 works · 6 lang.
- CONTROLHumanlike machines
Can people control what they make?
Whether a made thing can escape its maker, and who is responsible when it does.
Bacon, Shelley, Ure, Butler, Zhuangzi, Conference, Wells, Čapek, Russell, Haldane, Wiener
1627–1947 · 12 works · 4 lang.
- PERSONHOODHumanlike machines
Do artificial beings have moral standing?
Whether a made being can be wronged, and whether using one is a kind of slavery.
Aristotle, Descartes, Hobbes, Filmer, Locke, Voltaire, Bentham, Shelley, Huxley, l'Isle-Adam, Salt, Čapek
c. 330 BCE–1920 · 12 works · 4 lang.
- SACREDHumanlike machines
Is the machine divine, idolatrous, or providential?
Whether machines are objects of worship, instruments of God's plan, or false gods.
Bacon, Saint-Simon, Carlyle, Walker, Hawthorne, Arnold, Whitman, Carpenter, Adams, Forster, Haldane, Berdyaev
1620–1933 · 12 works · 4 lang.
- CIVILIZATIONBoth
Is machinery the measure of civilization?
Whether technical power shows that a people is advanced, or is a narrower thing than civilization.
Babbage, Macaulay, Feng Guifen, Fukuzawa Yukichi, Morgan, Ferry, Zhang Zhidong, Kidd, Belloc, Wells, Pearson, Yan Fu, Hobson, Bergson, Gandhi, Veblen, Tagore, Spengler, Césaire
1832–1950 · 19 works · 6 lang.
- STATEMachine-like humans
Is society a machine, and should it be?
Whether governments and nations are mechanisms, and what happens to the people inside them.
Hobbes, Kant, Schiller, Müller, Hegel, Carlyle, Thoreau, Spencer, Wilson, Tolstoy, Lenin, Weber
1651–1919 · 12 works · 3 lang.
- EXTENSIONBoth
Are tools part of us or foreign to us?
Whether technology extends the human body and mind or stands against them.
Rousseau, Carlyle, Emerson, Thoreau, Marx, Butler, Kapp, Bergson, Henry et al., Freud, Merleau-Ponty
1755–1945 · 12 works · 3 lang.
- INTIMACYHumanlike machines
Can an artificial being be loved?
Whether love for a made being is real or a deception.
Ovid, Descartes, Rousseau, Goethe, Kant, Hoffmann, l'Isle-Adam, Rilke, Freud, Rey
c. 8 CE–1938 · 10 works · 4 lang.