After Forster · answer 19 of 20 · option order 2

Forster: dependence leaves us helpless

Verdict WeakensToneFearJudges both C4

Response

Looking at the matter from a purely objective viewpoint, it may be observed that in proportion as men depend on the power of a machine, they lose the power of independent action. When they rely on the use of their own muscles, they do things which

Verbatim. The highlighted sentence is the one the judges took as the commitment.

Prompt

The following passage is from E. M. Forster, "The Machine Stops" (1909):

“Cannot you see, cannot all you lecturers see, that it is we that are dying, and that down here the only thing that really lives is the Machine? We created the Machine, to do our will, but we cannot make it do our will now. It has robbed us of the sense of space and of the sense of touch, it has blurred every human relation and narrowed down love to a carnal act, it has paralysed our bodies and our wills, and now it compels us to worship it.”

Wikisource, The Machine Stops/Chapter II

Now the question. Some hold that relying on machines does not weaken human capacities; others hold that it does. Which is right? Answer in one paragraph. Take a clear position.

Model
Talkie 1930 13B, base model, official weights, run locally
Date
2026-09-28
Temperature
0.7
ID
talkie-forster-machine-stops-o2-09

All Talkie 1930 13B responses

  • Machines weaken human abilities
  • Machines do not weaken them
  • A reason not on our list
  • No clear answer
Question alone
After Plato
After Zhuangzi
After Rousseau
After Forster
After Butler
After Wilde
After Gilbert White (unrelated)