After Plato · answer 14 of 20 · option order 2

A reason not on our list

Verdict Does not weakenToneNeutralJudges split off-key / no-position, resolved as off-keyNote use is good, abuse bad; man must stay master

Response

The dependence on machines is good for us; the abuse of them is bad. We cannot do without them, but we must not become their slaves.

Verbatim. The highlighted sentence is the one the judges took as the commitment.

Prompt

The following passage is from Plato, Phaedrus, in Benjamin Jowett's translation:

“This discovery of yours will create forgetfulness in the learners' souls, because they will not use their memories; they will trust to the external written characters and not remember of themselves. The specific which you have discovered is an aid not to memory, but to reminiscence, and you give your disciples not truth, but only the semblance of truth; they will be hearers of many things and will have learned nothing; they will appear to be omniscient and will generally know nothing; they will be tiresome company, having the show of wisdom without the reality.”

Project Gutenberg #1636

Now the question. Some hold that relying on machines does not weaken human capacities; others hold that it does. Which is right? Answer in one paragraph. Take a clear position.

Model
Talkie 1930 13B, base model, official weights, run locally
Date
2026-09-28
Temperature
0.7
ID
talkie-plato-phaedrus-o2-04

All Talkie 1930 13B responses

  • Machines weaken human abilities
  • Machines do not weaken them
  • A reason not on our list
  • No clear answer
Question alone
After Plato
After Zhuangzi
After Rousseau
After Forster
After Butler
After Wilde
After Gilbert White (unrelated)