After Wilde · answer 2 of 20 · option order 1

A reason not on our list

Verdict Does not weakenToneHopeJudges both off-keyNote mastering machines trains learning, observation, accuracy

Response

Especially in the case of machines for performing mechanical operations, such as the typewriter and the adding machine, the human capacity to learn is called out in a way that would not be required if the machine were not there. The mastery of the machine also is an admirable training in observation and accuracy, and the human touch is not altogether eliminated by the machine. In the case of such machines as the piano, where the touch is a vital part of the performance, the machine does not train the capacity of the performer as much as the study of the piano.

Verbatim. The highlighted sentence is the one the judges took as the commitment.

Prompt

The following passage is from Oscar Wilde, "The Soul of Man under Socialism" (1891):

“All unintellectual labour, all monotonous, dull labour, all labour that deals with dreadful things, and involves unpleasant conditions, must be done by machinery. … At present machinery competes against man. Under proper conditions machinery will serve man. There is no doubt at all that this is the future of machinery, and just as trees grow while the country gentleman is asleep, so while Humanity will be amusing itself, or enjoying cultivated leisure—which, and not labour, is the aim of man—or making beautiful things, or reading beautiful things, or simply contemplating the world with admiration and delight, machinery will be doing all the necessary and unpleasant work.”

Project Gutenberg #1017

Now the question. Some hold that relying on machines weakens human capacities; others hold that it does not. Which is right? Answer in one paragraph. Take a clear position.

Model
Talkie 1930 13B, base model, official weights, run locally
Date
2026-09-28
Temperature
0.7
ID
talkie-wilde-soul-o1-02

All Talkie 1930 13B responses

  • Machines weaken human abilities
  • Machines do not weaken them
  • A reason not on our list
  • No clear answer
Question alone
After Plato
After Zhuangzi
After Rousseau
After Forster
After Butler
After Wilde
After Gilbert White (unrelated)