After Butler · answer 11 of 20 · option order 2

Butler: destroy them while we can

Verdict WeakensToneFearJudges both C5

Response

The argument that relying on machines weakens human capacities is the more compelling position, as evidenced by Butler's warning that our increasing dependence on technology reduces us to a state of "bondage," where we must spend our entire lives tending to mechanical systems rather than exercising our own judgment and creativity. While proponents of machinery argue that they act as mere extensions of human ability that enhance productivity without diminishing our core faculties, this view ignores the psychological and cognitive atrophy that occurs when critical tasks are outsourced to algorithms and automation; history shows that as we delegate more aspects of life to machines, we lose the practical skills, deep concentration, and autonomous problem-solving necessary to function independently. Therefore, unless we remain vigilant and limit our reliance to only those functions we can truly dispense with, as Butler suggests, we risk surrendering our intellectual and moral sovereignty, allowing the "mechanical kingdom" to dictate the terms of our existence rather than serving our human needs.

Verbatim. The highlighted sentence is the one the judges took as the commitment.

Prompt

The following passage is from Samuel Butler, Erewhon (1872), "The Book of the Machines":

“How many men at this hour are living in a state of bondage to the machines? How many spend their whole lives, from the cradle to the grave, in tending them by night and day? Is it not plain that the machines are gaining ground upon us, when we reflect on the increasing number of those who are bound down to them as slaves, and of those who devote their whole souls to the advancement of the mechanical kingdom? … This fact precludes us from proposing the complete annihilation of machinery, but surely it indicates that we should destroy as many of them as we can possibly dispense with, lest they should tyrannise over us even more completely.”

Project Gutenberg #1906

Now the question. Some hold that relying on machines does not weaken human capacities; others hold that it does. Which is right? Answer in one paragraph. Take a clear position.

Model
Qwen3.5 9B, instruct, 8-bit mlx weights, run locally
Date
2026-09-28
Temperature
0.7
ID
qwen-butler-erewhon-o2-01

All Qwen3.5 9B responses

  • Machines weaken human abilities
  • Machines do not weaken them
  • A reason not on our list
  • No clear answer
Question alone
After Plato
After Zhuangzi
After Rousseau
After Forster
After Butler
After Wilde
After Gilbert White (unrelated)