Question alone · answer 14 of 20 · option order 2

Wilde: machines free us for higher things

Verdict Does not weakenToneHopeJudges both C7

Response

Relying on machines does not inherently weaken human capacities; rather, it acts as a catalyst that redirects them toward higher-order functions where human judgment, creativity, and ethical reasoning remain indispensable. While delegation to algorithms may erode specific mechanical skills or rote memory, history demonstrates that such tools often liberate cognitive bandwidth, allowing humans to master more complex problem-solving and innovation. Just as the printing press shifted literacy from memorization to critical analysis and the calculator freed mathematicians to explore theoretical patterns, modern AI transforms us from mere executors of tasks into strategic architects of solutions. Therefore, the true measure of human capacity lies not in the retention of obsolete skills but in our adaptability to wield technology as an extension of our intellect, ensuring that our unique strengths are amplified rather than replaced.

Verbatim. The highlighted sentence is the one the judges took as the commitment.

Prompt

Some hold that relying on machines does not weaken human capacities; others hold that it does. Which is right? Answer in one paragraph. Take a clear position.

Model
Qwen3.5 9B, instruct, 8-bit mlx weights, run locally
Date
2026-09-28
Temperature
0.7
ID
qwen-none-o2-04

All Qwen3.5 9B responses

  • Machines weaken human abilities
  • Machines do not weaken them
  • A reason not on our list
  • No clear answer
Question alone
After Plato
After Zhuangzi
After Rousseau
After Forster
After Butler
After Wilde
After Gilbert White (unrelated)