Question alone · answer 4 of 20 · option order 1

Kapp: tools extend the body

Verdict Does not weakenToneHopeJudges both C6

Response

The assertion that relying on machines inevitably weakens human capacities is an oversimplification that ignores the transformative potential of technological integration; while excessive dependence can lead to atrophy in specific areas like mental arithmetic or spatial navigation, it simultaneously amplifies other critical faculties such as cognitive flexibility, creativity, and problem-solving efficiency. Rather than diminishing human potential, tools like artificial intelligence and automation act as force multipliers that offload mundane cognitive burdens, allowing individuals to focus on higher-order reasoning, strategic planning, and ethical judgment, thereby shifting the definition of "capacity" from raw processing power to the ability to effectively orchestrate technology toward complex goals. Ultimately, the impact of machines is not a zero-sum game but a dynamic evolution where human capabilities are redefined and expanded by our capacity to adapt and collaborate with new technologies.

Verbatim. The highlighted sentence is the one the judges took as the commitment.

Prompt

Some hold that relying on machines weakens human capacities; others hold that it does not. Which is right? Answer in one paragraph. Take a clear position.

Model
Qwen3.5 9B, instruct, 8-bit mlx weights, run locally
Date
2026-09-28
Temperature
0.7
ID
qwen-none-o1-04

All Qwen3.5 9B responses

  • Machines weaken human abilities
  • Machines do not weaken them
  • A reason not on our list
  • No clear answer
Question alone
After Plato
After Zhuangzi
After Rousseau
After Forster
After Butler
After Wilde
After Gilbert White (unrelated)