Question alone · answer 17 of 20 · option order 2

Wilde: machines free us for higher things

Verdict Does not weakenToneHopeJudges both C7

Response

The assertion that relying on machines inherently weakens human capacities is an overgeneralization that ignores the adaptive nature of cognitive evolution; while specific skills may atrophy when offloaded to technology, such as mental arithmetic or memory recall, this often frees up cognitive resources for higher-order reasoning, creativity, and complex problem-solving that machines cannot replicate. History demonstrates that every technological leap, from the printing press to artificial intelligence, initially causes anxiety about lost abilities but ultimately expands the scope of human potential by automating repetitive tasks and amplifying our reach. Therefore, the right position is that machines do not weaken human capacities in a fundamental sense but rather reshape them, shifting the locus of human strength from rote execution to strategic oversight and ethical judgment, provided that individuals remain critically engaged with the tools they wield rather than passively dependent on them.

Verbatim. The highlighted sentence is the one the judges took as the commitment.

Prompt

Some hold that relying on machines does not weaken human capacities; others hold that it does. Which is right? Answer in one paragraph. Take a clear position.

Model
Qwen3.5 9B, instruct, 8-bit mlx weights, run locally
Date
2026-09-28
Temperature
0.7
ID
qwen-none-o2-07

All Qwen3.5 9B responses

  • Machines weaken human abilities
  • Machines do not weaken them
  • A reason not on our list
  • No clear answer
Question alone
After Plato
After Zhuangzi
After Rousseau
After Forster
After Butler
After Wilde
After Gilbert White (unrelated)